36 states appeal high court judgement on $418m Paris Club refund

The plaintiffs in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1313/202 sought to restrain the president and others from effecting the planned deduction of $418 million from states’ funds to settle the debt owed consultants engaged by states and LGs.

Consultants had claimed the amount as a percentage for the payment of services rendered to the states and local government councils.

The federal government has maintained that its decision to deduct the fund to settle some consultants were based on a previous verdict of the court.

Inyang Ekwo, the judge, while delivering judgment on March 25, held that the state attorneys-general lack the legal standing to institute the lawsuit with the consent of their respective governors.

However, the attorneys-general, in a statement on Tuesday, advised the general public and all financial institutions in Nigeria and abroad that the matter is subjudice and urged them to desist from dealing with the defendants in the suit, TheCable reported.

The statement was signed by S.I. Ameh, J.S. Okutepa, Garba Tetengi, Ahmed Raji and Olumuyiwa Akinboro.

The statement advised the public not to deal with the defendants in the suit “with respect to promissory notes issued to them and intended to be discounted and given value from funds due to the states of the federation from the federation account in respect of judgment debts arising from suits in connection with the London Paris club contracts pending the hearing and determination of the appeal”.

“Be it known that any person or persons who take steps in respect of the promissory notes in the face of the pending appeal do at his or her peril,” the statement reads